A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst potential neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment with a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are subject matter to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their prolonged-standing connection to the world as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Space of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into The ocean through a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized Accountant Paul Feely expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.